A New Chapter in the Energy Transition
The race toward net-zero emissions is accelerating, but the journey is complex. The first phase of the clean energy revolution was about scaling up solar, wind, and battery storage. This brought costs down dramatically, making renewables the cheapest source of electricity in many regions. Yet electricity alone cannot decarbonize the entire economy. Heavy industries like steel, cement, and chemicals still depend on fossil fuels for high-heat processes and chemical feedstocks. Long-distance shipping and aviation cannot rely on batteries alone due to energy-density constraints. For these hard-to-abate sectors, green hydrogen is emerging as the missing puzzle piece.
The Evolution of Hydrogen: From Grey to Green
Hydrogen has long been part of the industrial system. Globally, over 90 million tons of hydrogen are produced annually, but more than 95 percent comes from fossil-based processes such as natural gas reforming and coal gasification. This “grey hydrogen” is responsible for nearly 900 million tons of CO₂ emissions every year, which is roughly equivalent to the combined emissions of the United Kingdom and Indonesia.
To address this, industries experimented with “blue hydrogen,” which adds carbon capture and storage (CCS) to conventional hydrogen production. While blue hydrogen reduces emissions, its success depends heavily on capture rates and long-term storage security. Green hydrogen, however, breaks away from fossil dependence altogether. Produced through electrolysis powered by renewable energy, it generates hydrogen and oxygen from water, with no carbon footprint. As long as renewable electricity is the source, green hydrogen provides a fully sustainable pathway.
Why It’s Expensive Today
Despite its promise, green hydrogen is expensive compared to fossil fuels. In many regions, it costs up to five times more than natural gas on an energy-equivalent basis. This cost gap comes from several factors. Electricity is the largest input, contributing 60 to 70 percent of production costs. While renewable energy is cheap in locations with abundant sun or wind, such as deserts and coastal regions, grid-connected projects in Europe or Japan face higher power prices.
Electrolyser technology is another barrier. Current units cost between $800 and $1,200 per kilowatt and are not yet produced at large scale. To compete, costs must fall closer to $200 to $300 per kilowatt. Transport and storage present additional hurdles, as hydrogen leaks easily, weakens metals, and has low volumetric energy density. To move it safely, hydrogen must be compressed, liquefied, or converted into carriers such as ammonia, all of which add costs. Efficiency losses also occur at every step, from electrolysis to reconversion, reducing the appeal of hydrogen in sectors where direct electrification is possible.
Where Green Hydrogen Adds Unique Value
Green hydrogen’s real value lies in hard-to-electrify sectors. In steelmaking, the traditional blast furnace method uses coking coal to reduce iron ore, releasing large amounts of CO₂. Hydrogen-based direct reduced iron (H₂-DRI) replaces coal, producing only water vapor. Several European companies, including ArcelorMittal and SSAB, are already piloting hydrogen steel plants.
Cement production is another major target. Responsible for about 8 percent of global emissions, cement requires kilns heated to more than 1,400°C. Hydrogen offers a flexible and cleaner way to reach these extreme temperatures compared to electricity alone. The chemical and fertilizer industries also stand to benefit, as ammonia production the largest consumer of hydrogen today could transition to green hydrogen inputs, reducing emissions and creating exportable green ammonia. Similarly, methanol production, used in plastics and fuels, can adopt hydrogen alternatives.
In shipping and aviation, hydrogen provides pathways that batteries cannot match. Maritime industries are exploring green ammonia as a fuel, while aviation companies are testing synthetic jet fuels made from green hydrogen combined with captured CO₂. On the energy side, hydrogen also serves as seasonal storage. Unlike batteries, which store electricity for hours or days, hydrogen can hold energy for weeks or months, balancing power grids with variable renewable inputs.
Transport and Storage: A System-Level Challenge
Although versatile, hydrogen’s movement across geographies is complex. Pipelines are the most cost-effective method for large volumes, but they need specialized materials or retrofits to handle hydrogen safely. Liquefaction, which cools hydrogen to -253°C, is technically possible but consumes nearly a third of the hydrogen’s energy content.
As a solution, many producers are turning to green ammonia. Easier to transport using existing ships and infrastructure, ammonia can be used directly as fertilizer or fuel, or reconverted into hydrogen at its destination. Australia, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE are investing in green ammonia mega-projects aimed at exporting to Europe and Asia. Much like oil shaped global geopolitics in the 20th century, green ammonia and hydrogen could redefine trade patterns in the 21st century.
Global Investment Landscape
The global hydrogen market is seeing rapid investment. In Europe, the EU has pledged to produce 10 million tons of renewable hydrogen domestically by 2030 and import another 10 million tons. Germany is leading efforts to secure import partnerships with countries such as Namibia, Chile, and Gulf nations.
In the Middle East and North Africa, abundant sunlight and wind resources give countries like Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the UAE a strong advantage in hydrogen exports. Saudi Arabia’s $8.4 billion NEOM project is set to be one of the world’s largest green hydrogen facilities. India, under its National Hydrogen Mission, aims to produce 5 million tons annually by 2030, leveraging solar energy and industrial demand.
The United States, meanwhile, has rolled out the most generous subsidies globally. The Inflation Reduction Act provides up to $3 per kilogram of clean hydrogen through Section 45V tax credits, alongside funding for seven regional hydrogen hubs. In Asia-Pacific, Japan and South Korea are focusing on imports, while Australia is developing green hydrogen and ammonia exports using its vast renewable resources.
Technology Breakthroughs on the Horizon
Advancements in electrolyser technology are crucial to reducing costs. Currently, three main types are in focus. Alkaline electrolysers are the most mature and relatively cheap, though less effective with fluctuating renewable power. Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolysers are more expensive but better suited for intermittent solar and wind. Solid Oxide Electrolysers (SOECs), still in pilot stages, offer efficiencies above 80 percent by operating at high temperatures.
Scaling manufacturing capacity is key to cost reduction. Much like solar photovoltaic panels, which fell in price by more than 90 percent over two decades due to industrial scaling, electrolysers could follow a similar path once mass production ramps up.
The Policy Puzzle
Government action will determine hydrogen’s success. Carbon pricing can make fossil-based hydrogen less competitive, while tax credits and subsidies encourage early investment. The U.S. is leading with its subsidies, but the EU and Japan are also implementing incentive schemes. Contracts for Difference (CfDs) provide revenue stability for developers by guaranteeing minimum prices, reducing investment risk. Certification schemes, meanwhile, ensure that hydrogen labeled “green” is genuinely renewable-based, preventing greenwashing.
Without these frameworks, investors hesitate to commit to billion-dollar projects. With strong policies, however, governments can unlock demand and drive cost reductions through scale.
Risks and Constraints
Despite its promise, hydrogen faces risks and constraints. High production costs could slow adoption if subsidies weaken or carbon prices remain low. Supply chains for key materials, such as iridium and platinum catalysts, may become bottlenecks as demand rises. Water availability is another concern, particularly in arid regions pursuing hydrogen projects. While desalination can provide solutions, it adds cost and energy demand. Efficiency losses during hydrogen conversion and reconversion may also reduce its attractiveness in applications where electrification is already feasible.
The Road Ahead: 2030, 2040, 2050
The timeline for hydrogen adoption is taking shape. By 2030, large-scale projects in Europe, the Middle East, India, and the U.S. are expected to deliver commercial volumes of green hydrogen, focusing on industrial clusters and exports. By 2040, international trade in hydrogen and its derivatives, such as ammonia, is likely to be routine, with hydrogen replacing grey hydrogen in fertilizers, refineries, and parts of the steel industry. By 2050, if net-zero targets hold, hydrogen could supply up to 20 percent of global final energy demand, becoming a cornerstone alongside renewables, batteries, and carbon capture.
The Cornerstone of Industrial Decarbonization
Green hydrogen may not be a universal solution, but it is a critical enabler of net-zero. Its greatest promise lies in decarbonizing heavy industries and long-distance transport where electrification is impractical. While today’s economics remain challenging, the combination of falling renewable prices, advancing electrolyser technologies, and bold policy support is steadily moving hydrogen into the mainstream.
Nations and companies that invest early in hydrogen infrastructure and trade networks are likely to shape both the decarbonization pathway and the energy geopolitics of the 21st century. Ultimately, green hydrogen is not just a technology it is the bridge between a fossil-dependent past and a sustainable, industrially competitive future.
Related Blogs: https://ciovisionaries.com/articles-press-release/
